first of all: kudos then, the rest of the comment first a few words about the technique: i saw you submitted a few of those deviations where you kinda "blurred" the outlines. i really love-a-love it, because in my opinion, it's reflecting very well the way emotions and life in general is structured, in its being not-linear and not-understandable, having more than one level. i like them all a lot but i chose that one and "white ghost" because i like them the most. the impressions you can get of them are really amazing, because they're (in my case, at least) evoking emotions at the first second, and they're giving you their unique impression unused and freshly, no clichés, not worn out. in case of this one, i saw at first a black woman, gazing melancholically upwards. i know, now i'm perceiving it rationally, that there is nothing like that in the photo, but alf2 worked on my unconscious, i think, and it did well. the dark spot a few inches upon the center still seems to be an eye, though. now, that i'm looking at it more closely i see that a lot of the shadows or darker forms in your photo seem light, frazzled and they resemble of feathers, maybe in a boa. i imagine a person going to a party, wearing such a thing, which communicates levity and brighness. still respecting my first impression, though, i get all in all the feeling of observing something pitiable, and i have to think of a sad clown. all in all, i love the thing. really, you did very, very well, it's great artwork. but anyway, there are a few negative points: first, i miss the full view, because if i can only see your photo in this format, i can't get a good impression of it. please, change that! and then, i don't like that the title and the artist's comment are so unexplanative. that gives your work a bit of anonymity, like you didn't really appreciate it yourself and how should others do so, then? it lowers the artistic worth of your artwork and makes just like "any" deviation, especially if you give the same comment to every single one. and keep in mind that the title is decisive for the first impression of your audience. "alf2" won't be enough, there. all in all, a masterpiece marketed badly.
--
It's just a question of time
Before they lay their hands on you
And make you just like the rest
There are a lot of themes that run through the stock gallery many people have similar ideas but they pull them off in different ways. In this series of newsletters we will look at similar ideas but different outcomes.
Daily Literature Deviations is a group that is dedicated to bringing literature to the forefront of the deviantArt community. We attempt to accomplish this by daily featuring Literature artists from around the community that deserve the recognition, but are not getting it.
Each day we will feature 10 deviations from the Literature categories in a News Article. In order to support the artists that we feature, we ask that you the news article as well as check out the individual pieces. We understand that each day you may not be able to check out each and every one of the pieces, everyone has their own things going on. We just ask that you make an attempt to help support the growing Literature community.
When it comes to community spirit, `Rushy is a shining example. From participating in devmeets, to providing positive encouragement to other artists, `Rushy can always be found demonstrating what it really takes to be a true deviant. It's without any hesitation that we are delighted to award the Deviousness Award for July 2009 to `RushyRead More
Devious Comments
Comments
then, the rest of the comment
first a few words about the technique: i saw you submitted a few of those deviations where you kinda "blurred" the outlines. i really love-a-love it, because in my opinion, it's reflecting very well the way emotions and life in general is structured, in its being not-linear and not-understandable, having more than one level. i like them all a lot but i chose that one and "white ghost" because i like them the most.
the impressions you can get of them are really amazing, because they're (in my case, at least) evoking emotions at the first second, and they're giving you their unique impression unused and freshly, no clichés, not worn out.
in case of this one, i saw at first a black woman, gazing melancholically upwards. i know, now i'm perceiving it rationally, that there is nothing like that in the photo, but alf2 worked on my unconscious, i think, and it did well. the dark spot a few inches upon the center still seems to be an eye, though. now, that i'm looking at it more closely i see that a lot of the shadows or darker forms in your photo seem light, frazzled and they resemble of feathers, maybe in a boa. i imagine a person going to a party, wearing such a thing, which communicates levity and brighness. still respecting my first impression, though, i get all in all the feeling of observing something pitiable, and i have to think of a sad clown.
all in all, i love the thing. really, you did very, very well, it's great artwork. but anyway, there are a few negative points: first, i miss the full view, because if i can only see your photo in this format, i can't get a good impression of it. please, change that! and then, i don't like that the title and the artist's comment are so unexplanative. that gives your work a bit of anonymity, like you didn't really appreciate it yourself and how should others do so, then? it lowers the artistic worth of your artwork and makes just like "any" deviation, especially if you give the same comment to every single one. and keep in mind that the title is decisive for the first impression of your audience. "alf2" won't be enough, there. all in all, a masterpiece marketed badly.
--
It's just a question of time
Before they lay their hands on you
And make you just like the rest
Previous PageNext Page